Rose
|
|
« on: May 14, 2018, 02:22:49 pm » |
|
Jack got results of a second DNA test today which said Billy and Jack do not have the same biological father. Therefore, Jack is not John Abbott's biological son. Do you all accept that this is a done deal? Should there be further testing? And how do you feel about Y&R rewriting history?
|
|
|
|
Lynn1
|
|
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2018, 08:14:04 am » |
|
Even though it's dramatic, I still don't believe it. Those could've been flawed tests. Probably wishful thinking on my part, but I don't like how the history is being re-written.
|
|
|
|
soapoperafan_5
|
|
« Reply #2 on: May 15, 2018, 09:22:19 am » |
|
Even though it's dramatic, I still don't believe it. Those could've been flawed tests. Probably wishful thinking on my part, but I don't like how the history is being re-written.
Me either
|
|
|
|
Rose
|
|
« Reply #3 on: May 15, 2018, 11:44:49 am » |
|
I'm starting to wonder if John Abbott was anyone's father! Now I'm trying to remember back when Jill was with John. Was Jill faithful to him? I still think Jack is John's son, and I hate that they are changing the history of Y&R.
|
|
|
|
Rose
|
|
« Reply #4 on: May 15, 2018, 01:42:49 pm » |
|
I'm thinking Victor tampered with this latest DNA test.
|
|
|
|
soapoperafan_5
|
|
« Reply #5 on: May 15, 2018, 01:45:24 pm » |
|
I'm thinking Victor tampered with this latest DNA test. Why would he?
|
|
|
|
Rose
|
|
« Reply #6 on: May 15, 2018, 03:01:56 pm » |
|
I'm thinking Victor tampered with this latest DNA test. Why would he? Just to stick it to Jack, to leave Jabot in disarray and ready for a takeover by Newman, of course!
|
|
|
|
|